Showing posts with label Dancing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dancing. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Update on the No Show Showcase

(This is a continuation of part 1.)

I talked to L today, and she said everyone is apologizing to her. The three women B, H, and M apologized at L’s party on Saturday. D called her yesterday and fell all over himself apologizing.

What happened is, like I said, B, H, and M were organizing the showcase. But then some emergency matters came up for H and she gave duties to B and M. Then they realized they were not up to doing all the work themselves, so they gave all organizing duties over to their instructor D, but not before B and H got pissed at each other and stopped talking, which explains why B did not sit at the same table as H and M at the party, something I had not mentioned.

Then D, already known as a flake, decided he couldn’t deal with the organizing, so he gave all duties over to instructor T who, until then, had been a fairly minor player in all this. T was far removed from the original populist stance and saw no reason not to inject an exorbitant entry fee into the deal. After all, it’s just business, right?

L understands that this is how people do things. Her own students are out of the showcase and she is cool with everything. Of all the characters in this story, she has the most reason to be pissed, but she never really was pissed. The whole thing just makes her want to do things on her own terms, including having her own showcase sometime. And she says she still will go to this showcase as a spectator, because she knows all the people and wants to support them.

Me, I have not nearly as much reason to be pissed, but I am pissed. I'm pissed that it seems that B, M, H, and D just seemed to let T take over and levy his fees, and nobody really did anything about it until it occurred to them to tell L just 1.5 weeks before the event, and she started asking questions. Then it was like, "Oh yeah, sorry, I guess we screwed you." (But maybe there's more to this and I shouldn't speculate.) And I’m pissed at B for the way she told me about the entry fee, with the attitude that everything was settled and I probably wasn’t going to be performing, but I’d still be coming to watch, right? But maybe I should give her a break. When she first brought the issue up, she probably thought L had already told me. But I’m kind of glad L had not, because that put B in the hot spot of having to explain it to me and falling back on her Bush Press Secretary techniques.

After all those folks apologized to L, instructor T, originator of the entry fee, called L. In his salesperson voice, he said, “I understand you have some questions about the showcase.”

“Oh no,” L said. “No questions. We’re just not doing it.”

He was silent for a moment, then asked why.

She said she doesn’t believe in the entry fee.

He said some blah blah about why the fee was necessary, and he hoped they could work together sometime in the future, and L said cheerily, “Okay,” and that was the end of that.

Now the three women B, H, and M are eating their own breakfast for letting the showcase fall into the wrong hands. Though their entry fee is discounted to $100.00 (an offer not made to L’s students but which she learned about through a leak) it is still $10.00 higher than the $90.00 they used to pay to dance in the other studio showcases that had inspired them to hold their own showcase with no entry fee. So here they go paying an entry fee again. Genius, I tell you. The situation is way beyond my Dirty Dancing analogy. Now, it’s like how we always end up helping the sorts of people in the Middle East we claim to be fighting against. First we helped the Sunni tribes in Afghanistan to kick out the Soviets. Some of those jihadist fighters were the precursors of the Taliban and Al Qaeda who, feeling empowered by defeating one superpower, decided to lure the other superpower into fighting them in Afghanistan where they would be able to declare another “victory.” So we go and give them not one, but two wars -- and in Iraq, our war allows the influx of Al Qaeda into Sunni territory, causing us to empower Sunni tribes to fight Al Qaeda, thereby undercutting the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government that we had said we were working so hard to uphold, and empowering the tribes, which makes the Sunni regions of Iraq look more like Afghanistan, which is where 9/11 terrorism was fomented in the first place.

Meanwhile, in the Sunni districts of Baghdad, the leader of the resistance to Al Qaeda is someone nicknamed "Abu Abd" who was once an officer in the Baath party, then a member of the “Islamic Army” which resisted the Americans before allying with the Americans to kick out Al Qaeda. His three-month agreement with the Americans is about over, but it could be renewed. Read about it here.

Continue . . .

Sunday, November 25, 2007

No Case for the Showcase

I’m dancing with B and she says, “Are you coming to the showcase next Sunday?” I say, “Yeah, I’m dancing in it.” It’s what L and I have revised our old tango routine for. Everyone involved knows we are in the showcase.

B says, “Maybe.”

I say, “What do you mean ‘maybe’?”

She says there’s an entry fee. $150.00.

The showcase is a week and a half away, and this is the first I’ve heard of an entry fee.

Dance showcases are kind of like piano recitals in that dance students perform for other students and friends and family. Showcases are usually held by studios that have several instructors and lots of students, and on the docket of performances are student/student pairings, student/instructor pairings, and a few instructor/instructor pairings just to show off and spice things up.

Showcases are very much unlike piano recitals in that they charge big bucks to any performing couple where one or both partners is a student. (Since I am not a professional or an instructor, I qualify as a student as L's partner.) In other words, the students have to pay to perform. They are paying for this after having already paid for many private lessons to get their routine ready in the first place. So, while piano recitals are viewed by piano instructors as chance for students to show what they can do, dance showcases are viewed by instructors as a chance to gouge their students for more money.

One studio in our area charges $90.00 to perform in a showcase, and $35.00 just for a ticket for a spectator! Remember, spectators are paying this to see mostly amateurs perform -- not to see a wholly professional show.

In the past B has performed in such showcases, and so have her friends M and H. These three women have paid $90.00 to perform and have had nearly no friends or family come to watch because the spectators’ tickets were so expensive. So, the three of them decided to organize this upcoming showcase and run things differently. Their own instructor, D, who is not affiliated with a studio, was involved from the beginning. So was my dance partner L, who is also an unaffiliated instructor.

L got several of her student couples to prepare routines for it, and she asked me to do the tango routine with revisions with her and I agreed, and we’ve been working pretty hard on it.

So now, in this somewhat circumspect way, B is telling me that “Maybe” I would perform because, at some point, an entry fee was tacked on for performers. It is up to L and me to decide whether we will pay it -- but B is presuming that, because of the entry fee, we will only be “Maybe” performing.

She is right to think that the entry fee would be prohibitive. But it’s not her business to presume.

I say, “I never knew of an entry fee.”

She says most showcases have entry fees.

I say “But this showcase was supposed to be populist. You weren’t going to charge exorbitant entry fees like the studios do.”

She says “Well, we are trying to get away from [what another studio owner in our area does]. She charges $90.00 per performance.”

“But you are charging more!” All this time, we’re trying to do samba, but all I can think to do is the most basic step because of this ridiculous conversation we’re having.

B says, “We have to pay for the [venue at the local university].”

I don’t think to ask why they are only now realizing how much that venue costs.

“It was miscommunication,” B says. “People playing phone tag.”

The dance is over and we’re going back to her seat. “But anyone could have sent an email explaining about the entry fee at any time,” I say.

“Well, eventually that’s what happened,” she says.

It’s like talking to Bush’s Press Secretary.

All this happens at L’s dance party last night. At its end, as we’re taking down decorations, I talk to L about it. She says she’s sorry she hadn't told me about the entry fee. She had only heard about it two days before, and there was Thanksgiving.

“We are boycotting it,” she says. She doesn’t want her students to have to pay like this. So we’re not doing the routine.

She says she’ll have her own little showcase at one of her parties. She’ll just have the students do their routines for each other that way.

I think that in the end, what L is describing is what this whole showcase was supposed to be in the first place. Just folks getting together and dancing for each other. Lots of mutual support there. And she and I will do our routine there, so all this prep will not be for nothing.

A third instructor, T, had been brought into the showcase mix later in the planning. He may have been the one to bring up the entry fee idea. L has written to D and T asking who will get all this entry fee money which, for the expected 20 performances, will come to $3000.00. No one has responded. The fact that they had told her about it as an afterthought means that she probably was not going to see any of the money.

Nobody puts Baby in the corner. This dirty dealing is like in Dirty Dancing, where misunderstanding and politics edged Johnny Castle out of performing the finale in the season talent show.

Now, it’s not that L and I were going to be the hit that Castle and Baby were when he came back to fight the power and perform. And it’s not like we would make a stand for populism the way Castle did when he involved the audience members in dancing at the end. But it IS about the common good being suppressed in the name of some personal gain -- in this case, greed. This independent showcase has become what it set out to counteract.

As she was leaving L’s party, B told me that she hoped I would come to the showcase. I said it depends on how much I have to pay. B said spectator’s tickets were only $10.00. So, in this respect I guess, it is cheaper than the typical dance studio showcase. I said “maybe,” using her word from our first conversation. But I’m not going. They changed the deal on us, then told us about it without the slightest sympathy for our position. So I’ll put my energy into L’s little improvised showcase whenever that happens. And you know what? I bet L won’t put up any restrictions or obstacles to who can perform (one reason being that there won’t be that many entries anyway). So probably B, M, and H can perform there if they want to. For free, and with their instructor D. Already, they regularly come to L’s parties, and don’t they feel welcome? As a single guy and capable dancer, don’t I make sure they get some dances in? Again, it’s not that I set world on fire. It’s that most of the men at L’s dances are pretty much beginners and have come with their wives and don’t feel comfortable dancing with anyone else. I’m usually one of about three men that do. So I make sure that B, M, and H get some dances.

Maybe its time I start charging a little “entry fee.”

Part 2 of this saga is here.

Continue . . .

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Revising that Red Dress Routine

Revised the tango routine from last March. Second half is mostly different. Now, to get to where we can really do it.

Gotta figure out what I should do with my hands in a lot of places. She always knows what to do with hers. Lot of style points for me to work on too. Regardless, it always looks better in compressed video. She wears the dress and shoes in practice every now and then, 'cause it makes a difference.



Continue . . .

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Dancing With a Star

It was at some point on the first day, the setup day, that I heard that MF and JP were going to be there. I called my dance partner and left a message.

“They’re having these auditions here and MF and JP are the judges, and all you gotta do is read some portion of some script -- all the info is online.” I carefully read the web address in the message.

My dance partner has been in local theater productions, has worked as an extra and a key extra, had a small part in the TV series DC.

I didn’t get a response to that message. I imagined my dance partner rushing to get ready for the audition, too busy to call me back. I wanted to not know when she would show up -- to just see her walk in the door and blow everyone away with what I know she’s got. Here was a chance to have her in something I was also working on, and with MF and JP as well!

The next day the judges started seeing contestants. Before each one entered, the producer would pass out papers to the judges showing the next contestant’s answers to his screeming questions. “Please note item number 7,” the producer might say, “which says that he sweats profusely.”

One contestant had stated, on his papers, that he has a rare form of diabetes involving kidney failure, and needs to drink water continually.

“You have to drink 3 gallons of water every day?” the judges asked him. He concurred. “You must be just constantly pissing,” they said. The contestant kind of nodded but said nothing, and I wondered if he were handling it some way he didn’t want to mention, like maybe with diapers. The judges harped on that for a while; it was then said that the guy was also an ironman triathlete; the guy read his part and wasn’t very good; they let him down easily and he left.

In his absence, the judges kept on about his disease, speculating on how he could compete in a triathalon if he had to pee all the time. I wondered, to myself, if maybe doing extreme exercise, and sweating, was the only time he could get a break from his constant peeing. The liquid was needed elsewhere, on the skin, so it could go there instead of to his bladder. You know, like how ADHD people finally get to focus and connect with the world, in a sense, when they are in an environment that reflects the spasms going on in their brains, like when playing a video game or performing search and rescue during a hurricane.

MF explained the name of the disease, pointing out that the prefix “nephr-” means “kidney.” Looking at her website, one can see that she knows about world health matters and diseases.

In the random conversations that occurred during the days, it was MF who had the assessments and background information to offer. While talking about relationships with JP, she said that she didn’t know what was up with younger folks these days. “I work on these shows with these young girls, and it’s amazing, they have nothing to talk about. Their minds are empty.”

JP said, “Plus, they’re crazy.”

MF said, “Well, men like crazy women.”

I was putting a mic in her orange sequined blazer at the time, and I said, “I tend to go for the crazy ones,” not even looking up from her blazer.

“Well, there you go, even [Elrond],” she said.

Another contestant had written on his papers that he loved architecture. After a series of contestants who had little to say for themselves, who got through the audition just by being cute (MF told one, “You can’t just vamp your way through this”), MF took the opportunity to ask him who his favorite architect was. When he named his first and second favorites (names I have not heard of), she nodded, smiling, as if seeing something new in a person -- knowledge of architecture that rivals hers, perhaps? She said, at another time, that she was an avid reader.

Another contestant mentioned something that he had “learned in social studies,” and MF said dryly, “At least they’re still teaching social studies.”

At the end of this first day of seeing contestants, I called my dance partner again and left another message. I said look, they’re doing this thing here and not enough contestants are showing up. They need people. I know you can bang this out. If you do it, you may see me in the room, but don’t worry about saying “Hi” to me. Just do your thing for the judges.

But I harbored a fantasy. What if they asked her about her ballroom dancing, and what if she said, “My dance parter is right over there?”

“[Elrond]?!?!” they would say. Surely, they would make us dance together. I would take off the headphones and leave the faders set in some lowish, safe position and go out there and hope I would look confident enough, happy enough, while struggling to overcome stiffness accumulated from standing all day, and to remember moves that we have not practiced for weeks because we’ve both been so busy trying to earn a living. No doubt, MF would have something to say about our presentation, would have notes for me in particular, because she has spent her life dealing with these matters of poise and stage presence. I would probably not feel that I had impressed her and the others, but I could at least say something like, “I did mambo for MF today, and this is what she said about my hip movement . . .”

I had decided I would suggest mambo because there was room for it on the small “dance floor” they had laid down for the contestants to stand on, and because I had heard a nice slow mambo in the music selections that the producer would play from his iPod during the down times.

That night I called my dance partner again, and this time she answered. She said it sounded like a neat thing to do, but she was really busy and had 5 hours of lessons to teach the next (and last) day of auditioning, and there was so much to do regarding home repairs and other matters.

Okay, I said, I understand. But, I told her, these folks are here, it’s right here in town, and I’ve seen them give a gold ticket to (that is, pass on to the next level of auditioning which will be in New Orleans a few months from now -- the second round of the ”tournament,” so to speak) people who have as much talent overall as you have in your little finger; I’ve seen you do so much better without even trying. But do what you want, and I won’t say any more about it.

She said she’d think about it.

On the morning of the second and last day, as we were about to start, the producer said that there were only six contestants waiting outside. I called my dance partner again, and she answered. I said, “Look, I had said I wouldn’t hassle you about this again, but I just wanted to say, there are only six people here now, so there might not even be much of a wait.”

She said that she had awakened with a migraine and couldn’t keep food down, but she’d do her best. And she said she had talked to her husband the previous night and he had said, “Where is the audition,” and she said, “in Durham,” and he had said, “well you silly, go and do it then!”

“Thank goodness for my coaches,” she said. “That’s what I’m talking about,” I said.

We went through the morning, seeing the contestants as they came. We had lunch at 2pm, and on the way through the hotel lobby to our lunch area, I scanned the upcoming contestants in the waiting area. My dance parter was not there.

After lunch, I did see her there, filling out her forms. I spoke to her. She was on low energy, mellow, quiet, unassuming.

The first batch after lunch were more of the cute ones who had hardly prepared, had nothing to say for themselves, and couldn’t act at all. By now, our judges had acquired a little bit of edge and would say, “It’s clear you have no experience, and if you really want to be an actor, then take some classes and see how that goes. And good luck. Stay in school.”

(My dance partner told me later that some of these contestants came out of the room crying. One of them said, “How can she shatter my dreams like that?” and my dance parter said to her, “Nobody can shatter your dreams. I’ve done this a hundred times and had my guts torn out. It’s the only way you learn to get better.”)

Eventually, the door opened, and it was my dance partner who stepped through, into the lights. She still had that low-energy demeanor. She took her place on the mark in the middle of the room, and MF said right away, “It says here you are a ballroom dance instructor.”

“Yes,” my dance partner said.

“Dance with JP,” MF and AZ said. “Can you dance with him?”

My dance partner nodded cheerily, and I was nodding as well in my shadowy corner behind the tent-like chimeras. She has been making beginning male dancers look and feel good for years.

“Nothing hard. Not tango,” said MF, again knowing something about a subject. Tango is indeed one of the harder ballroom dances.

JP was crossing the room -- no urging needed here for a star to do something when he’s on camera already.

“We’ll do a box,” my dance partner said. “So, come forward on your left foot.” She back led him, keeping her head up, her poise that MF would approve of. JP was looking down, watching his feet. The other judges hooted and clapped, and then JP took the lead, breaking out of the box and turning my dance partner in quasi-swing, stepping back too far on his rock-steps and letting his arm get too extended. My dance partner made it look good though, doing what she knows how to do, her eyes stabbing along their momentary sightlines as she spun, her long curls bouncing.

JP started to go back to his seat, then returned to the dance floor and said, “Can you jitterbug?”

“Sure!” my dance partner said. I have never exactly jitterbugged with her. Or shagged, really. She says that it’s all the same, just swing. JP started leading her in something that was pretty much swing, and there were more turns and spins, and then it was over.

“Wow, she really can dance,” he said, returning to his seat.

MF said, “It also says you run a non-profit acting troupe that goes to assisted living homes?”

My dance partner talked about that. MF said, “As someone who has had a mother in that situation, thank you for bringing joy into those lives.”

It was time for my dance parter to show what she had prepared. She spread papers around on the floor, and I thought “Uh-oh, she’s going to be one of those that moves around.” We had just the boom mic for the contestants, and the boom operator was up on a ladder to keep himself and shadows out of the sightlines of the four cameras. Being up there meant that he could not move laterally very much. Some contestants had walked out of his boom range and had to be heard off-mic.

She was doing a scene from this movie about a rock star, the scene where one of his girlfriends is on drugs and becomes furious with him. She started sitting on the floor with those papers around her, and our boom guy had to lower the boom much more than normal. This risked getting it in to the criss-crossing camera angles, but he could see the monitors from where he was sitting on the ladder, so he could see if he were dipping in anywhere.

My dance partner started with her manner confused and quiet, her pale Irish face wondering but not inquisitive, like a child’s. How does it affect parents when they see their grown children, as actors, revert to childhood like this? She stood up and came to my side of the room, off mic, and was now paranoid, strung out, her voice cracking near some nervous breaking point, warning some imagined person that the rock star would not care about her; then she flew across the room to the other side, again off mic, and screamed at the rock star in the way that it sounds like the throat is being torn. It was the only audio that distorted in the whole two days.

I had not been able to see her face, and now I really wish I could see the video of it, but this may have to wait until the show comes out, and even then, who knows if they’ll use it.

The judges were quiet for a few moments, and then AZ started saying things like, “You were really well prepared . . . I thought it was a little over-the-top, but has potential . . . as far as voting on whether you should move to the next level, hmmm, I’m not sure . . . it seemed a little crazy . . .”

The authoritative MF said, “JM would drive any woman crazy.”

AZ said, “Well let’s see how the others vote.”

MF said, “I say absolutely yes.” It was the most positive response anyone got from any judge the whole time.

JP waffled like AZ. It was like they were judging my dance parter by different standards. They had given the gold ticket to others who showed “potential” or “could be directed.” If they thought her performance was a little crazy, couldn’t they ask her to do it again, tone it down a little, see if she can take direction?

No, she got no second chance. I had practically begged her to come here and do this when she had other things to do, necessary things with a clear goal that she was certain to achieve. She had changed her priorities for the day, put her heart into this, and now two of the judges had gone all “New York Times Critic” on her, acting like exacting standards had been theirs all along.

She had been right in her first reaction to my messages, which was to blow this off and get her errands done.

I forget how the two guys actually voted. At least one begrudgingly voted yes, because I recall them saying half-heartedly, “Congratulations. You got a call back,” and AZ handing out the ticket to her.

My dance partner said “Thank you,” and stepped up to take her ticket. As she went back to the stage area and bent down to pick up her papers, JP said, “Nice job. Thanks for coming in.” And my dance partner said, with a little crack in her voice, “Thank you too, it’s a pleasure, I really admire your work.”

When she had left, the producer talked it over with the judges. They talked about how, with some direction, she could be someone who might have a chance. They shrugged. I was thinking, “You knuckleheads, you don’t know what to do with someone who is good; who may, with a little more focus, really surpass the acting skills of any of these judges; someone who has also demonstrated a practical side by employing herself and earning a living, who has a college degree, who took the time to learn ballroom dance so she wouldn’t have to support herself by being a secretary, who has put much effort into a long-term relationship which has turned into a very solid marriage, who has built a following of real friends and clients . . .”

Oh wait, those are real accomplishments. Hollywood just wants someone they can use, who gets the ratings, who gets a few laughs, and who cares if the laughs are the malicious kind.

On the phone later, my dance partner told me they had made her wait for four hours before her audition. I had not expected that to happen. One of her dance students had cancelled that day, so that was good, but the next one she had to cancel. Even with that, after the audition she had five more hours of teaching, then grocery shopping to do.

We were talking as she was driving home. It was almost 10 o’clock and I had just finished my day and packed up all the gear and put it in my car. For me, it had been a 13 hour day.

I said that I couldn’t believe the judges had acted uncertain. I told her she was easily in the top three who auditioned the whole time, and they gave out maybe eight or so total callbacks over the two days. The other two top contestants, in my view, were a student at the local university who acts in a soap opera there and, on her second try at her audition (after getting some direction!) had made herself really cry over a lost lover; and a woman from a town to the west who is in a semi-professional improv comedy group and gave a fairly original-seeming interpretation to a scene she did, though I don’t remember now why I thought that.

My dance parter said it was all political. The actors behind the desk were just trying to prove something because “they’re all washed up,” she said.

“But MF is on top of her stuff,” I said. “And she gave you an absolutely positive ‘yes.’”

“Yeah. Well. I’m not gonna think about it. If they call me, I’ll think about it then.”

“Would you go to New Orleans for the second round?”

She sighed. “I’ll just have to see.” She had practical matters to think about.

I guess it gets even more political in the later round, as in all reality shows. I can’t wish this nonsense on her. It’s like MF said in the previous post. If there’s anything else you can do that will make you happy, then do that.

“At least you got to dance with JP,” I said.

“Yeah, that was awesome.”

“It sounds like you really admire him.” I had not paid attention to him back in the SNL days, or at any time.

“Yeah, I liked his stuff. He was hilarious.”

So there was that at least.

She was arriving home. I could hear her dog barking in the background on her phone.

“Are you gonna celebrate?” I said.

“I’m gonna eat some nachos and go to bed,” she said.

Continue . . .

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Check Out This Dress!

This American tango routine is the fourth dance demonstration my partner and I have done. We did this back in February this year. Thanks to her for getting me into this, for all this dancing we've been doing, for the longest running partnership I've had with any person for any reason. And thanks to the cameraman for taping a rehearsal and traveling with us that cold night to make this video. Your smooth operation brings tremendous improvements to our performance!

As always, we felt really good after we did it, but watching the video revealed lots of things to improve. Then compressed video, the great equalizer, skips enough frames to conceal some of these blemishes, and makes everything look more snappy overall! Watch it here, or on YouTube where it's a little smoother. (And I have to say, if you watch it on YouTube, then check out some of the wonderful tango videos that appear in the "Related Videos" list just to its right. Lots of really awesome performances there.)



We've been learning the Dance Vision (DVIDA) American Silver syllabus for a few years now, and many of the moves in this routine come from that. But while our past mambo and cha-cha routines consisted mostly of syllabus moves with slight variation, we really tried to really cater this routine to the music whole-hog.

And this time, the music has many varied moods. You've heard of Cell Block Tango? Well this is the cell phone tango. I don't know why we chose "La Cumparasita" by Rodriguez, but I do remember the day my partner brought in a CD with 6 different versions of this song by various orchestras for us to choose from. Once we picked that, we had to make up the routine. My partner can make something up in an instant -- you could put on any song, any style, she would not have to have heard it before, and she could dance something to it that looks like a planned routine. So she improvised a lot, and where we could we brought in a portion of a syllabus move. There was also a move she had seen on a TV dancing shows that she wanted to use, and for the softer middle section we wanted to bring in some Argentine tango which I had had a tiny bit of instruction in, and have since taken up again. (This Argentine part could use a lot of improvement, and I'd like to revisit it in the future.)

For my part in it, I kept saying things like, "This is cool, but we gotta do something that reflects that little run in the music there." Or, "We gotta do pivots here, so that means we have to take out 4 measures of something earlier." One day she just told me to go home, work on it, and have it straightened out when we met again. I made an Excel spreadsheet with each column being a beat, eight beats to a measure, one measure per row. In most of the boxes, I wrote a description of what we were doing at that moment. I played the music over and over, moved my measures around, worked it out so it all fit.

We had the routine ready to demonstrate in January, but I got work that day and could not do it. So it was put off to February, and in the extra month, we added more stuff. Then one day we had someone videotape it, and it looked like crap. We had made up this bitch of a routine, and we could hardly do it. That was seriously one of the most depressing things that has happened to me in, say, the past half year. (Which I guess means things were going okay, overall, since this hardly qualifies as real hardship.) At that point we had just two more weeks before the February demonstration. And we never really know how much we'll be able to practice in a given week, because so much of my work comes up at the last minute. But we got it together, had it taped again the next week, and it looked much better.

Right now, there are no more routines on the horizon. We really have to get this syllabus done, get tested, get it out of the way so we can start learning some new stuff.

Continue . . .

Monday, May 14, 2007

One of Those Days

I was called Sunday about a job Tuesday. I said I could do it, but that I don't have equipment, so I hoped I could get that together on Monday. The job would have two or three people talking on camera and the producer warned that there would be a few wide shots. I said that for those wide shots I would probably rely on wireless mics. To this, the producer replied, "I am not a wireless mic person. Don't you hate the sound of wireless mics?"

There are darn few people who make small videos who like boom better than wireless. I've had reality TV producers tell me to put the boom away. They just want the camera to fly, they want the body mics to get everything, the sound guy to stand back and be neither seen nor heard. It doesn't matter to them that mixing body mics makes them sound phasey, or that one person's coughing ruins another's good sound bite. They just need those quick bites they can grab, like when the daughter goes into the newly remodeled kitchen and exclaims, "Mom, you've got THREE ovens!"

Here was a producer with the opposite leanings. Old school. Like they did it in the day when boom mics ruled the Earth, and wirelesses were mere rodents lurking in the underbrush, running from everything. When I first worked on a movie in audio about 15 years ago, I was a cableperson for a sound guy who hated wirelesses and pretty much trusted all audio to one boom operator, sometimes two, with me filling in as second boom. Sometimes he did use up to 3 wireless mics, but these were mostly on outdoor wide shots. And sometimes he preferred to plant a mic on the set -- in a windowframe or on a column -- than to put it on a person. Constantly frustrated by wireless mics, he would sit at his audio cart and, during down time, fuss with them, trying to figure out ways to put them on people to make them sound decent. I think this is the biggest challenge I face too.

So anyway, here was a producer who wanted me to make the boom work. But we decided we'd still get wirelesses, because we wanted to be sure we had it all covered. Who knew what surprises the lighting guys would make for me, throwing lights everywhere and possibly thinking that I could just stick wirelesses on the actors.

I had to get up at 7:30 am Monday just to get ready to make calls at 8am. At 8 I left several messages about gear. Lights were already coming from one rental company, so it might make sense to rent audio gear from them. But they only had two units of the latest model of fancy-schmancy wireless systems, and I would need three. The cameraman for the job was known to have some wirelesses, but his probably were not this new model, and there is a theoretical problem that can develop when mixing the old and the new, because the new have a 3 millisecond delay in their sound, and as every sound guy knows, 3 milliseconds is just enough. Then there was this other company in Raleigh that I work for a lot that has 4 of these top-model wireless systems all rigged up in a 4-channel mixer bag with ergonomic shoulder harness. I tentatively asked if I could just make my own arrangement with this company, and the producer said sure, go ahead with that.

Luckily, this audio package was available.

But still, the boom mic needed to be a really good one, and the company in Raleigh does not have a really good one -- just the kind that everybody uses. So I arranged to get the really good one from the rental company providing the lights.

So then I had to wolf down breakfast and meet my dance partner at her and her husband's new house. We used to practice at a theater space in town, but she has left that place and plans to build her own studio on her property. Until that is built, she has to teach her students wherever she can, and she and I practice in her bare wood-floored living room. Their new house is a ways out of town, so now it takes 20 minutes for me to meet her.

Knowing what all I had left to do that day, it was hard for me to concentrate on how much turn to make on each step of each move of American Rumba, which is what we have space to work on in her living room. 5/8 turn here, 1/4 turn there. This is what we are memorizing for the American Silver Certification. I only had an hour to spend with her before I had to leave and bust-ass to the next city over to pick up the gear for Tuesday.

I made it there, got the gear, turned around and came back partway along the interstate and stopped to do a half-day afternoon gig at a major networking corporation in their studio. They do live webcasts from there, and these are the most stressful gigs I get these days, because I have to have deep understanding of the audio routing that someone else made up, and I have to react quickly and pot up and down on the fly, and sometimes insert sound effects like applause, and cross-fade to musical selections or "commercials," while sitting right next to about three folks who outrank me give me sometimes conflicting information on how things work, or what to do next. And there are all these voices going at once -- the ones on the studio monitors, the ones on the feed from the central corporate office, the people in the room, and for some reason, somebody down the row from me had a radio going.

Anyway, that went okay. Then I had to get to the rental company in the next town over in the other direction, and get the really nice boom mic.

Then I had to get toilet paper because we were out, and we had two prospective housemate interviews to do that evening.

Then I had to get home and be there for the two interviews. I and the current housemates quickly swept a little, put toilet paper on the rolls in the bathrooms, took out the kitchen trash. I also brought in the audio gear before the first interview and rigged the mic from one place to the boom and mixer from the other place and checked all that out.

The interviews went okay, but what with everyone's uncertain plans, we don't have anything nailed down yet.

Then I had to make dinner, at 10 pm.

All day I had been trying to memorize the actors' lines (5 pages or so) for Tuesday, because I would have to operate boom. I rarely have boom-intensive days, so I really wanted it to go well. But I've been having terrible problems concentrating on anything these days, 'cause my mind is always jumping around and obsessing. Last summer I tried two different kinds of ADD medicine, and they didn't make any difference.

Today, Tuesday, I got up at 5am and studied the lines some more, ate breakfast and showered, and went to the job. I was 10 minutes late because of a confusing thing on Google Maps' directions that I should not have let confuse me.

Setup was easy there. We had to wear our socks because we could not get the white-painted floor for chroma-keying dirty. I paced around and continued to work on the lines.

And I was not my best, not really. It had been so long since I had used this really nice boom mic, and I had forgotten how sensitive it is. Sheesh. I had boomed with it a lot of times in the past, but never had to do so while carrying the mixer and receivers in a bag slung around my shoulders. It was a lot to think about. I kept shaking the boom and jarring the cable inside it, something that causes no trouble on common boom mics, but on this one causes a rattle.

So I was cautious in the first scene. I didn't grab all the off-camera lines on boom like I usually try to do, but I got them the on-camera stuff okay.

The second scene had one actor sneezing loudly and the other comforting him in a softer voice. I had to position the boom to even these levels out some, and I did manage this okay. So I felt better about that.

The third scene had lots of moving in and out for me to cover the actors standing far apart. The rattly boom was extended nearly all its 16 feet, and I was springing back and forth on my toes, in socks, again with the mixer and receivers suspended from my shoulders. By the end of the last scene for the day, I felt like I was kind of in the boom operating groove again. But I had to turn that nice boom mic back in, and I won't be using it for a while. I'm back to the mundane interviews and simple shots for now.

After work, I went to another Argentine tango lesson. Then I was sitting at home eating fruit and yogurt, with the audio gear from the company in Raleigh on the other end of the dining room table. I was looking at it, thinking about how I had picked it all out for this company a year ago, when we were getting very demanding reality TV work and we barely had the gear to cover it, and a deal fell through one time to rent gear for a job, so the company owner told me to tell him what to buy and he would get it. So now there's the gear. If I were to buy my own, I'd get the same stuff. But then, so many folks around here have gear and want me to use theirs, I probably would not be able to pay off my own gear if I had it. And this particular gear from Raleigh doesn't get enough work anyway for itself. So it makes sense that I rent it from them when I do need it.

It's just that I imagine having gear like it. 4 excellent wireless mics and a mixer that you can really put your name on, 'cause it will last probably 8 years in rough conditions. Of course, those mics and that mixer allow you to mix 3 or 4 wireless mics together in one muddy track which sounds mediocre at best, and terrible to a studio recordist. And the wireless systems don't sound as good as a $25.00 hardwire connection, and cost 100 times that. Still, with such mics and that mixer, you can keep up with today's wild and crazy camerapeople and talent, and that's pretty much what you gotta do in audio these days. You get hired if you can keep up. Nobody ever gives feedback on audio quality.

Continue . . .

Friday, May 11, 2007

Back to the South

I waited a year before trying out a different Argentine tango instructor. Actually, all this time, I had not even known about this second instructor. I had thought this area had only the first, and I had had trouble relating to much of his instruction. “You don’t get what you want by making her do it,” he would say. “You ask a question, and she answers. ‘Would you like to go this way?’ ‘Yes I would.’ Or maybe she doesn’t. So, you adapt. Just like you do in life.”

I mean, I wasn’t (and rarely am) in a relationship; I was just there to start learning a new dance. And sure, Argentine tango is about mindset as much as anything else. But in those classes it seemed almost like I was supposed to think a certain way, and it would happen, like Clint Eastwood flying Firefox. The internationally renowned Lithuanian ballroom teachers in town are more down-to-Earth.

Argentine tango dancers say their dance is a more natural way to move than ballroom tango, but I had serious trouble with the Argentine body positioning. In ballroom, our arms are firm and held out to the sides, making a big steering wheel with plenty of leverage for leading. The woman plants her lower right front rib firmly against my belly, and she pretty much stays there, rolling around to my right side for promenade position, and back for closed. Our upper bodies and heads are apart from each other, giving us room to breathe and to see, respecting the “my dance space, your dance space” convention à la Dirty Dancing.

In Argentine tango, we keep our arms softer and lower by our sides. Our bodies are closer at the top and more separate lower down. So, while ballroom tango looks wider at the top like Vermont, Argentine tango looks wider at the bottom like New Hampshire.

I couldn’t give a clear lead. I was knocking knees with women, stepping on their toes, because they didn’t feel me coming at them. Hadn’t I taken care of this in ballroom? Apparently I had to learn it again here.

I let my butt stick out backwards, which folded my body at the waist and lessened whatever slight connection I had with my partners to begin with.

I couldn't visualize turning my partner and myself, especially with that tilted New Hampshire shape. I kept nearly falling over. Anyway, how do you turn your partner when your arms are so soft?

Then there was close embrace. After only a few lessons, partners were supposed to actually touch chests to each other. What if the woman is much shorter than I? Then she’s staring into my chest. And if she’s taller, I’m staring into hers I presume, but this did not happen in those classes. Regardless, I am a fairly standoffish person. In fact, a few people have told me that I am just about the most sensitive to personal space of anyone they know.

In ballroom, personal space is preserved in a sense. Though your stomach and pelvic regions are connected, that’s down there, out of sight, where God intended men and women to connect; and you’ve got room to breathe in front of your face. In Argentine tango, I can hardly see because her head is in the way, and the problem with stepping on her feet is compounded.

I gave up. I wasn’t getting it. Bad attitude, I know. This was a drag, because Argentine tango had seemed to be the most vibrant and accessible social group for someone my age in our area -- more so than swing (more peppy than though) or salsa (more sexy than though) or ballroom (too insular and more populated by folks over 55 and under 22). So when I heard about this other teacher, I decided to give it another try.

He started us on close embrace the first day. But he explained that you don’t really lean on each other at the upper body in the way I had thought. Instead, our legs are inclined forward some, but then our torsos are upright, and my partner and connect over much more surface area, from the stomach up through the chest. We look not like New Hampshire, but like an upside down “Y,” or a peace symbol. Already, this new understanding is helping me. Still, I struggle.

In the first classes I took a year ago, I had harbored the question of whether my troubles were entirely my doing, or maybe caused in part by my partners. I never said anything about this ‘cause it’s bad form to raise this question in a dance class. This second instructor sees when you’re struggling, takes the woman, tries her out, and then decides whom to lecture -- me or her. It’s not really so reassuring when he lectures her. I’d just as soon take the heat. Though he is blunt, he's clear, and I’m getting a lot more sense of technique here. That’s what I need. Tell me how to do it. I am a shape and movement imitator. Don’t expect me to improvise or make it up myself -- I just wander that way.

In the first class with the second instructor, there was this other woman who, dancing with me, wanted us to extend my left/her right arm out to the side like ballroomers do. “It’s prettier like this,” she said. I still had the scars from being corrected on this a year ago. “Nope,” I said in a rare instance of directly contradicting a partner. “This is Argentine tango. It’s all in here,” and I drew our arms in to be lower by our sides.

I had to get her used to reality. She had probably seen some ballroom movie and wanted to glide around the floor. Sorry, sister, you came to Argentine class. Keep your eyes downcast and concentrate on your abdomen. If you're good, maybe, in a year, we'll let you raise your leg and wrap it around mine.

After this second instructor had taken her for a turn and showered her with instructions, she came back to me an said, “Have you been to the other instructor? Is he different?” She was asking about the first one I had been to.

I said he was different, but I didn’t have a chance to elaborate. I have not seen her come back in subsequent lessons.

I’ve been two more times now. Days are turning into weeks, which may turn into months if I stay with it this time. It’s like being in some abstinence program. I tried it once, and relapsed. Maybe it will stick this time.

Continue . . .

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

At the Contra Dance, Don’t Be a Sandinista

You’re trying to understand what the caller just said. “Hay?” Some tall sweaty guy with a band about his brow slaps his own shoulder and points sternly. Ah, you see that you should pass him on that side, thank you very much. He’s a coder by day, moved up in the world because he can find the no-frills cheap solutions, the quickest way out, get in the car, we have to go. You were just now headed there, your arms full of stuffed animals and little trucks you absolutely have to take with you on a long trip, that you just spent too long looking for under the bed and in the rec room, and the car door has been opened for you, but you’re not moving fast enough for Dad and he shoves you from behind and says, “Now look up the line.”

Confused, you look at him instead. What’s the line, and which way is “up”? He doesn’t understand that you've memorized about 130 moves of a silver level American ballroom syllabus. You know “diagonal wall,” “diagonal center,” “counter body movement,” “outside partner,” “backing line of dance.” You don’t need to take this from him.

He has broken rhythm, left his partner waiting, to point the way for you ‘cause apparently you look like you need it. “Look up the line.” Oh yes, he meant, look for the next partner because she’s coming and are you ready for her?

They have said to look into your partner’s eyes to keep from getting dizzy. She’s smiling, she’s looking into yours. You try it, and the world behind her head whirls in your peripheral vision, makes your eyeballs ache, and you must look away. Don’t they know, you look to distant spots, hold your vision on them before snapping to the next one. Don’t look at your partner, she’ll make you sick.

You know how to back-spot-turn in one beat, get your partner around and you’re finished, waiting for the others to catch up for the remaining 3 beats. But here they’re all skipping around each other faster still and more leisurely, swinging by linked elbows, looking into each other’s eyes, and arriving at the right time. It’s wrong, and they’re happy.

Here come the next eyes, a pair you had spied across the room earlier, smiling at someone else you presumed was her boyfriend. Now she’s inches away, smiling at you. Can you trust those eyes and let the world whirl where it may?

Continue . . .

Sunday, January 28, 2007

I Didn’t Know My Therapist Was In the Audience

She came up to me afterwards, and I was glad that she had seen me doing something other than sitting in her office whining.

This was the third time my dance partner (not my therapist, though the boundaries do blur) and I did a demonstration as part of a dance event. I was really working on smiling and not acting like I was doing martial arts (see Not the Snake).

My dance partner and I felt good about this performance when it was over, but after watching this video we found lots of things to tighten up for our second performance of the same routine the following Saturday, which went better. Video of that may be posted sometime, but right now it is stuck in media transfer.

Addendum 1/30/07: After watching the tape of the second performance, we are less than thrilled with that too! So we'll leave just the one video up here for now.

Most of these moves are in the Dance Vision (DVIDA) American silver cha-cha syllabus, but we shortened them significantly to make the routine a little more intense. Again, the video is a little smoother on YouTube.



For our next routine, currently in rehearsals, we are really catering our moves to the music more. It will be American tango danced to a highly expressive rendition of “La Cumparasita,” which is probably the tango melody on your cell phone. We are drawing on the DVIDA American silver tango syllabus but really using just pieces of those moves and combining them with ideas from television dance shows, my partner’s jazz background, and a little inspiration from Argentine tango. Since it has so much that is off-syllabus, I have had to chart the moves on a spreadsheet where each square is one beat, and there are eight beats to a measure. My dance partner thinks the spreadsheet is nuts. I say it is yet another good reason to have invented written communication. Like the Magna Carta and other important documents, it helps to settle differences between the parties involved.

Continue . . .

Not the Snake

This was the second time my dance partner and I did a demonstration at a dance event. It was back in March of 2006, and I had spent weeks worrying about the death drop at the end. It’s not the move that gets you -- it’s the face. Before taking up ballroom dance, my only movement experience was in a Filipino martial art called arnis, and there we generally have a very sober expression and exhale sharply in the midst of doing moves. That just does not fly in most ballroom dance. Luckily, in this particular performance, we “overturned” the whole routine a little and I ended up facing away from most of the audience members when the death drop occurred. And in compressed video, you can't see it that well anyway! Yes, thank goodness for bandwidth limitations, the great equalizer . . .

My dance partner, on the other hand, is a natural entertainer, having spent her life in jazz and other dance forms. This is clear from the video, regardless of compression or frame rate. Speaking of which, it plays a little more smoothly over on YouTube, so you could watch it there if you want, or below.

This is mambo from the Dance Vision (DVIDA) American silver syllabus.

Continue . . .

Friday, January 19, 2007

Swing Dancing with Lesbians

I get bored with the ten or so swing dance moves I know. At dances, women get to follow all the moves known by the different men they dance with, but we men can lead only what we have learned. Seeking to inject some excitement into a recent swing event at the Durham Armory, I decided to venture across the floor and ask some of the lesbians to dance.

Only two were easily accessible at at the edge of the floor. They sat with arms around each other, smiling. I could see that I would be busting up a tender moment, but they had seen me making a bee-line toward them, and there was no turning back. I bent over and asked one to dance, keeping my eyes on her so that there would be no doubt about which one I was asking. I intended to ask the other one to dance on the next song, so that I would not be playing “favorites.”

As my question sank in, their happiness seemed to drain away behind their smiles, which remained only as facades. Some other lesbians sitting behind them ceased their conversation and watched to see what would happen. A rejection was certainly pending. I mustered a fake smile of my own and prepared to give a pleasant response like, “That’s okay, I’ll catch you some other time,” and then walk away and never bother them again.

The woman I had asked to dance said nothing and turned toward the other, who spoke up with, “I’ll dance with you,” as if making a stand in order to spare her partner some hardship. We took to the floor, and I wondered, why the awkwardness? Is it really so painful for a lesbian to dance with a straight male? And then it hit me: the couple takes lessons together. One has learned to follow, the other to lead. I, a leader, had asked the leader to dance.

With straight people, you can generally tell leaders from followers by gender. But with gays, you have to look a little deeper.

Continue . . .